#Total war warhammer naval battle full
#Total war warhammer naval battle license

But how do you make Norscan ships interesting? They'd fight almost entirely by boarding (both based on their current roster, and how real world Vikings, their inspiration, fought naval battles) with a bit of skirmishing. VP would have 17th century style ships of the line combined with undead sea monsters, Dwarves would have slower heavily armored steamships that can mostly ignore wind, but never go particularly fast, and High Elves would have very fast ships equipped with masses of Lothern Sea Guard and Eagle Claw Bolt Throwers, with their Dragons that they can send out to raze enemy ships. Some factions, like Vampire Coast, Dwarves, and even High Elves would be pretty fun. You may have liked Rome 2's, but the majority of people didn't enjoy them, as they always devolved into the enemy just boarding every ship you had and winning due to having cheats from higher difficulties. The problem is that the only super fun naval battles that they've managed to do are 18th and 19th century battles between ships with cannons. In short, only if they really start milking Warhammer Fantasy for all its worth, having no other option to continue to produce content for people who are fans of the fantasy setting but not so big on the historical settings (either because they never were, or because, like me, the unit diversity of fantasy has ruined historical games for them).

#Total war warhammer naval battle license

I could easily see them eventually making a naval battle DLC for Warhammer 3, but only once they've exhausted all of the possible race and lord packs, and only if they don't end up making a Warhammer 40K game or getting the license for another fantasy setting like Middle Earth. I wanted naval combat in 3K because of Red Cliffs but, I also wouldвЂ™ve auto resolved boat loads of naval battles because the AI wouldвЂ™ve microвЂ™d my trade ports to death. ThereвЂ™s no bonus to them to spend money and time working on a part of the game hardly anyone plays.

#Total war warhammer naval battle full

I would rather focus on more land battles than naval battles when the computer micros 4 full stack navies with no impact on their income.Д®dit: And as others have said and before 3k came out, why spend time on a naval combat system when the majority of naval engagements were auto resolved.

Leave the micro managers to not use the auto-patrol/protect/raid options but, it just becomes far too tedious when IвЂ™m on my 6th major naval engagement of the turn and I have to do a 25 minute battle or risk losing 1/4th of my income, then 2-3 major land battles or risk losing momentum on campaign.

If we could automate our navies to a certain extent, in general I would agree with you. It would be really tedious in Shogun 2 and FOTS if you didnвЂ™t truly micro manage a dozen full stack high technology tier ships, you would generally need more like 18 full stack navies to dominate the seas where youвЂ™re not getting stabbed in the kidneys every 5-6 turns by a yoloвЂ™d navy appearing out of no where blockading your port. Since itвЂ™s pretty clear when a faction with 1 single region in WH2 can recruit and maintain a full stack army, it would be absurdly tedious to deal with naval warfare in a WH Total War title. Playing Empire and FOTS, and in specific Shogun 2 naval battles, the AI would need to be limited in WH3 on their ability to recruit/build a navy past their income. I would/could get behind this if the AI has harder limits on their ability to bypass income restrictions.